People who think that animals should be used for research are heartless. In order for animal based research to be of any benefit it should comply with the rigorous standards expected of scientific studies. He says that animal experiments provide misleading data. Type I is typically diagnosed in patients younger than forty years of age when the pancreas stops producing insulin properly. Animals are not humans, so testing is not accurate.
All in all, zoos are prisons for animals. Although zoos probably are not a good idea to treat them, I still agree that we should keep animals in the zoos. A poll of 3,748 scientists by the Pew Research Center found that 89% favored the use of animals in scientific research. For testing, such tiered rounds are important because it reduces the level of error and any negative side effects. My English teacher said that my essay was good, except that it was too much like an article. The research proves that because there are other options available, animal testing should be banned. The welfare regulations and inspection regime which should but are not always see above adhered to also add an extra layer of costs.
Some dogs, cats and a variety of goats, ferrets, pigeons, monkeys and rabbits are also used. There are regulations for animal testing that limits the misuse of animal during research. Imagine someone kidnapped you and made you an exact replica of your own house. Research animals are cared for by veterinarians, husbandry specialists, and animal health technicians to ensure their well-being and more accurate findings. For example, ' On the other hand. So what types of alternatives are being used today? This is a major concern because if the research is flawed so are the results which can lead to them being invalid.
What the hell is wrong with you guys. There are currently no laws combating the testing of cosmetics on animals, but the practice is harmful and must be ended. It would thus be justified to assert that animal testing should not be banned. But the poor little animals that die everyday because of testing. When the reasons were investigated it appeared that the animal tests may not have , with no blinding or randomization meaning that there was potential for cherry picking of statistical outliers tests which include no reported randomization are 5 times more likely to render a positive result than those that are conducted against rigorous guidelines.
You only get one shot at it. The question then is, what justifies using a monkey? I assume many of you have pets including cats, dogs, rabbits, and mice. They also have baboons strapped down with their heads in vices to do certain tests on them. You can order whatever sort of beagle, rat, pig or mouse to mention a few that your laboratory wants to test on. Taylor 132 even supports this idea by indicating that very few animals are sacrificed during such experiments which help to not only save millions of people, but also animals.
Animals should be treated with respect and dignity, and this right to decent treatment is not upheld when animals are exploited for selfish human gain. While we may, at one stage in our development, not had any choice but use animals as proxies to test the safety of new substances before human trials we no longer need to rely on these old and outdated methods, recent years has seen a step change in the technology available to us rendering animal testing obsolete. Are you happy to be indirectly responsible for the distress to mother and baby as young chimps are? Everyone that thinks animals should be abused well you can go to hell. Using cell cultures can only reveal side effects on a molecular level and cannot unfortunately, reveal side effects like organ failure, rashes, tumors, or cardiac arrest like animal testing can. Thousands of mice, pigs, rats, and rabbits die every year in the United States alone. All suffering is undesirable, whether it be in humans or animals.
Sapontzis gives his theory as to why animals should not be used in testing. Scientists use animals to test a theory and then alter their theories based upon the valuable information gathered from each experiment. Blakemore support Taylors point by indicating that vaccines for polio and cervical cancer, insulin, antibiotics, heart-bypass surgery, among others were all advances that were achieved through animal testing. For instance, many famous lifesaving drugs were invented in this way, and animal experiments may help us to find more cures in the future. Animal rights activists believe that animals are used for pointless tests and suffer tremendously Beckoff, M.
I hope it gets a lot of traffic and that people will actively participate in on-going discussions and debates. Several people, about 60% of the population, agree that animal testing should be banned because it is just wrong. We have taken the opportunity to list here, in answer to the other list on this site, the 10 reasons why the author of that article is wrong and why animal testing is not only cruel but also inefficient, expensive and dangerous. Wouldn't you get scared and confused? Maybe it will just snap its neck trying to escape. The results were ; the objective of the tests was clearly set out in less than 60% of the studies.